Ira McDonald wrote:
> Hi,
>> XPS - I agree with Mike that it's not appropriate as a required document
> format for IPP right now. But it *is* being formally standardized in ECMA
> Technical Committee 46:
>>http://www.ecma-international.org/memento/TC46.htm>> And their current draft 1.2 is much improved from the earlier drafts
> - worth watching.
Unless the patent stuff is resolved to allow for open source/free
software implementations, I would be opposed to adding it even if
it gets an ECMA stamp of approval.
--
______________________________________________________________________
Michael R Sweet Senior Printing System Engineer