Hi Bill,
Your understanding of these 3 operations is correct.
I'm sure you just found a bug if there's *any* state table
difference between Reprocess-Job and Resubmit-Job.
Tom and Mike - comments?
We should discuss this bug next week during our
continuation of JPS2 review, if not before.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
winter:
579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
734-944-0094
summer:
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:46 PM, William Wagner <wamwagner at comcast.net> wrote:
> Understood (I think):
>>>> A.Restart-Job causes a retained job to be reapplied to the printer. Job-ID
> etc are retained
>>>> B. Reprocess-Job causes a copy of a retained job to be created as an
> independent new job, with its own Job-ID etc, but with all submitted
> attributes the same as the retained job (except for save and proof)
>>>> C. Resubmit-Job causes a copy of a retained job to be created as an
> independent new job, with its own Job-ID etc, but with the potential of
> changing the values of the attributes in the retained job and adding new
> attributes. All the values of attributes that are not changed are kept the
> same as in the retained job (except for save and proof)
>>>> Question 1: Reprocess-Job can refer to a retained job in the aborted state
> (RFC3998 para 4.1) Resubmit-Job cannot refer to a retained job in the
> aborted state (JPS-2 table in para 5.4). Is this difference intended?
>>>> Question 2: Is a Reprocess-Job with no changed attribute values and no new
> attributes the same as a Resubmit-Job (with the possible exception of the
> aborted job distinction)?
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Bill Wagner
>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.