Tom,
The PWG Semantic Model schema uses JobDelayOutputUntil and
JobDelayOutputUntilTime which aligns with the JSP2 specification.
(schema elements dropped the '-' and uppercased the following letter) I
prefer to have the schema track JPS2 and I think the JPS2 attribute name
is more descriptive. The MFD specification will synch up with JPS2 when
it is in final form.
Pete
Peter Zehler
Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
From: Tom Hastings [mailto:tom.hastings at verizon.net]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:13 AM
To: Zehler, Peter
Cc: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: ISSUE: Should JPS2 shorten "job-delay-output-until[-time]" to
just "job-delay-until[-time]" to align with MFD (and PWG Semantic
Model)?
Peter,
ISSUE: Should we remove the "-output" from the name to align the names
more with the MFD spec (and PWG Semantic Mode)?
In other words:
"job-delay-until"
instead of :
"job-delay-output-until"
and:
ISSUE: Should we remove the "-output" from the name to align the names
more with the MFD spec (and PWG Semantic Mode)?
In other words:
"job-delay-until-time"
instead of :
"job-delay-output-until-time"
Tom
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20100419/dd0cd9e7/attachment-0001.html>