Hi Glen,
No - our PWG Naming Policy requires that the first part
of the filename be the responsible working group.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Christmas through April:
579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
734-944-0094
May to Christmas:
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Petrie, Glen
<glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com>wrote:
> Since the title of document is called the "PWG Rater Format" I believe
> we should change the file name to wd-pwgraster10-xxxxx instead of
> wd-ippraster10-xxxxx
>> Glen
>>> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
> Michael Sweet
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 9:37 PM
> To: ipp at pwg.org> Subject: [IPP] (Another) New PWG Raster Format draft posted
>> All,
>> The previous updated draft of the PWG Raster Format has two whole
> subsections accidentally deleted from it... Here is a newer and even
> better version with the lost subsections added back in along with the
> IANA IPP registration templates for good measure:
>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327.pdf>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327.docx>> The -rev version shows the changes from the last "good" version (Feb
> 23rd)...
>> ________________________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20110426/911e81ce/attachment-0001.html>