Given that I concur with "filtering".
--
Smith Kennedy
Hewlett-Packard Co.
smith.kennedy at hp.com
On Oct 18, 2012, at 4:50 PM, "Michael Sweet" <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> Smith,
>> The definition of the filtering/coloring used has always been a little squishy, but generally Get-Printer-Attributes with a document-format should always return a proper subset of the Get-Printer-Attributes response without a document-format value supplied (where that proper subset might be the whole shebang...)
>>> On 2012-10-18, at 6:28 PM, "Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect)" <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>> I agree with the use of "filtering" if including the document-format attribute in a Get-Printer-Attributes operation should always return a subset of what is returned when document-format is NOT included as an attribute in the operation request. If that is not supposed to always be the case, then I worry that the term "filtering" might be misleading. I cannot think of concrete examples for or against, but I wanted to point this out.
>>>> HTH,
>>>> Smith
>>>> /**
>> Smith Kennedy
>> Hewlett-Packard Co.
>>smith.kennedy at hp.com<mailto:smith.kennedy at hp.com>
>> */
>>>> On 2012-10-18, at 10:56 AM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic at gmail.com<mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>> I agree with replacing "coloring" with the standard "filtering" term.
>>>> I found coloring in a lot of minutes, but also couldn't find it in the
>> IETF or early PWG IPP specs.
>>>> Cheers,
>> - Ira (buried in TCG meetings this week)
>>>>>> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
>> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
>> Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
>> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
>> Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
>> Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
>> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
>> Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
>>http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>> mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com<mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com>
>> Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
>> Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
>> Temporary Cabin *** 2012 only *** 906-494-2523
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com<mailto:msweet at apple.com>> wrote:
>> All,
>>>> I have gotten more feedback on the continued use of the term "Coloring" in IPP specifications, and the reference back to 2911 as the reason for continuing its confusing existence.
>>>> Thus far I have gone along with this reference - I remember us using the term when IPP/1.0 and 1.1 were being hammered out so naturally we must have used it in the spec, right? But when one of my colleagues actually went looking for the term being used in 2911 she couldn't find it. And then I went digging...
>>>> So, as far as I can tell, we have *never* used the term "coloring" in an IETF RFC for IPP. I also could not find the term used in ISO DPA. The only place we have used it is in IPP JPS3 (now published) and IPP Everywhere (pending posting for Formal Vote).
>>>> I also did a search of the mailing list archives and found several uses of the term, but I don't see it in any of the drafts (other than JPS3 and Everywhere)
>>>> So, can anyone point me to the origins of the term? Given the number of complaints about this in the past (even for JPS3), the obscure usage, and the apparent lack of precedent, I would prefer to use "filtering" (as requested on several occasions) instead of "coloring" in IPP Everywhere.
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> __________________________________________________
>> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>>>>>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>> ipp mailing list
>>ipp at pwg.org<mailto:ipp at pwg.org>
>>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>>>>>>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
>> ipp mailing list
>>ipp at pwg.org<mailto:ipp at pwg.org>
>>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>> __________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.