[IPP] Call For Adoption HTTPbis BCP56bis

[Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect)]

Hi Mike,

Can you give us the elevator pitch about this update? What value do you see it providing?

Smith

/**
    Smith Kennedy
    Wireless Architect - Client Software - IPG-PPS
    Standards - IEEE ISTO PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum / USB IF
    Chair, IEEE ISTO Printer Working Group
    HP Inc.
*/



> On Oct 12, 2017, at 7:23 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> FYI, it looks like the HTTP WG will be updating this document...
> 
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus at mozilla.com <mailto:pmcmanus at mozilla.com>>
>> Subject: Call For Adoption HTTPbis BCP56bis
>> Date: October 11, 2017 at 1:51:06 PM EDT
>> To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg at w3.org <mailto:ietf-http-wg at w3.org>>
>> Resent-From: ietf-http-wg at w3.org <mailto:ietf-http-wg at w3.org>
>> 
>> Folks, I'm going to open up a 2 week call for adoption period to see if the group has consensus for adopting work on a bis version of BCP56 (aka RFC 3205; On the use of HTTP as a Substrate).
>> 
>> Mark introduced this work both on the general ART list and with a presentation at IETF 99.
>> 
>> His draft, which is the subject of the adoption call, can be found https://mnot.github.io/I-D/bcp56bis/ <https://mnot.github.io/I-D/bcp56bis/>
>> 
>> The ART discussion is archived here: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/art/current/msg00303.html <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/art/current/msg00303.html>
>> 
>> The presentation at IETF 99 is here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-httpbis-sessb-bcp56bis/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-httpbis-sessb-bcp56bis/> (That's a pdf - trust your content-types!)
>> 
>> The minutes from IETF 99 are here: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/minutes?item=minutes-99-httpbis-00.html <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/minutes?item=minutes-99-httpbis-00.html>
>> Personally, I think this is an important document to update, and contemporaneous efforts like JMAP and DOH illustrate the relevancy.
>> 
>> We'll leave the CfA open until October 27. I'm looking for arguments pro or con and especially expressions of interest in collaborating and reviewing the document. Thanks. Please weigh in.
>> 
>> -Patrick
>> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20171012/30174adc/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4241 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20171012/30174adc/attachment.p7s>