Hi Mike,
I like this new attribute. I've been hearing developers bemoan that they
have
much finer-grained support for print-quality for the past 25 years.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 3:33 PM Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
> All,
>> As an alternative to adding more (out of order) enum values to
> print-quality, how about a print-quality-percent (integer(0:100)) attribute
> where:
>> - print-quality-percent='25' maps to print-quality='3' (draft),
> - print-quality-percent='50' maps to print-quality='4' (normal), and
> - print-quality-percent='75' maps to print-quality='5' (high5)
>> Thoughts?
>> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
>>>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20190828/03c17533/attachment.html>