[IPP] RFC: print-quality-percent (integer(0:100))

[IPP] RFC: print-quality-percent (integer(0:100))

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Wed Aug 28 20:21:52 UTC 2019


Hi Smith,

I see your point about unique labels, but are you suggesting that we
should define finer-grained standard "print-quality" values?  (I suggest
that there lies madness.)

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434



On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 4:04 PM Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards
Architect) via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> The only problem I see is that vendor- or site-defined print quality
> values, printer vendors likely want labels that can at least uniquely
> identify the additional settings, and that could have corresponding
> _tooltip and _helpurl content.
>
> Smith
>
> /**
>     Smith Kennedy
>     HP Inc.
> */
>
> On Aug 28, 2019, at 1:33 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> As an alternative to adding more (out of order) enum values to
> print-quality, how about a print-quality-percent (integer(0:100)) attribute
> where:
>
> - print-quality-percent='25' maps to print-quality='3' (draft),
> - print-quality-percent='50' maps to print-quality='4' (normal), and
> - print-quality-percent='75' maps to print-quality='5' (high5)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
> <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/IvxiC2kr5rfp2N1mkU1hC1u?domain=pwg.org>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20190828/8b254505/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list