[IPP] Canon issues about suggested job accounting fields - "Source-document-name(s)" and "Client host network identifier(s)"

[IPP] Canon issues about suggested job accounting fields - "Source-document-name(s)" and "Client host network identifier(s)"

Rick Yardumian ryardumian at ciis.canon.com
Sat Feb 15 01:09:56 UTC 2020


Hi,

In Smith's Job Accounting Fields important to HP email( thread http://www.pwg.org/archives/ipp/2019/020282.html), he lists "Source document name(s)". Is "Source document name(s)" mapped into RFC 8011 'document-name' or other IPP attributes? If "Source-document-name(s)" is mapped into 'document-name', how is the plural of names handled?

Canon requests that the end user have a choice to opt out of sending "Source-document-name(s)".


Canon thinks the mapping for currently defined IPP Job Description or Job Status attributes for Client host network identifier(s) (hostname, various addresses) is not clear. So the end user does not have clear way to opt out of sending Client host network identifier(s) (hostname, various addresses) which is not good. If Canon's understanding is correct, Canon does not agree to the idea that Client host network identifier(s) are important.



Best regards,

Rick


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20200215/7e7d5179/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list