Smith,
At first blush I see some duplicated sizes from the registry:
na_arch-c_18x24in
na_arch-d_24x36in
and the MSN2 spec doesn't allow those...
Also, while I appreciate keeping the na_WIDTHxHEIGHT_WIDTHxHEIGHTin form for those dimensional sizes, if they are primarily for photo/art printing I'd like to see a 'photo' prefix in the name portion, e.g.:
oe_photo-16x20_16x20in
Similarly, the om_photo sizes should include the dimensions if there is no corresponding well-known name:
om_photo-300x400_300x400mm
> On Mar 2, 2021, at 12:29 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
>> Greetings,
>> HP Inc. is requesting the registration of additional keywords for the “media” attribute [STD92] for some standard sizes that aren’t yet registered. Here is the registration template and the keywords to be added:
>> Attributes (attribute syntax)
> Keyword Attribute Value Reference
> -------------------------------------------------------- --------------
> media (type2 keyword | name(MAX)) [RFC8011]
> na_arch-e1_32x40in [HP20210302]
> na_super-c_18x24in [HP20210302]
> na_super-d_24x36in [HP20210302]
> oe_10x12_10x12in [HP20210302]
> oe_10x15_10x15in [HP20210302]
> oe_14x18_14x18in [HP20210302]
> oe_16x20_16x20in [HP20210302]
> oe_20x24_20x24in [HP20210302]
> oe_22x28_22x28in [HP20210302]
> oe_24x30_24x30in [HP20210302]
> om_photo_300x400mm [HP20210302]
> om_photo_300x450mm [HP20210302]
> om_photo_350x460mm [HP20210302]
> om_photo_400x600mm [HP20210302]
> om_photo_500x760mm [HP20210302]
> om_photo_600x900mm [HP20210302]
> media-supported (1setOf (type2 keyword | name(MAX))) [RFC8011]
> < all name values > [RFC8011]
>> Let me know if there are any issues.
>> Cheers,
> Smith
>> /**
> Smith Kennedy
> HP Inc.
> */
>>>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
________________________
Michael Sweet