Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <ipp at pwg.org>:
> So if no other changes, this would be the registration:
>> Attributes (attribute syntax)
> Keyword Attribute Value Reference
> -------------------------------------------------------- --------------
> media (type2 keyword | name(MAX)) [RFC8011]
> na_arch-e1_32x40in [HP20210302]
> oe_photo-s8r_8x12in [HP20210302]
> oe_photo_s12r_12x15in [HP20210302]
Isn’t “S12R” 12in by 18in (2:3), while 12in by 15in (3:4) is “12R”?
> oe_photo-14x18_14x18in [HP20210302]
> oe_photo-16x20_16x20in [HP20210302]
As already noted, this would be “16R”.
> oe_photo-22x28_22x28in [HP20210302]
> oe_photo-22r_22x29.5in [HP20210302]
One reference gave “22R” as 20in by 29.5in, which makes no sense.
> oe_photo-24x30_24x30in [HP20210302]
> oe_photo_24r_24x31in [HP20210302]
“24R” is elsewhere listed as 24in by 31.5in. 32in would make even more sense.
> oe_photo_30r_30x40in [HP20210302]
> om_photo-30x40_300x400mm [HP20210302]
> om_photo-30x45_300x450mm [HP20210302]
> om_photo-35x46_350x460mm [HP20210302]
Is this the metric approximation of English 14x18 above?
> om_photo-40x60_400x600mm [HP20210302]
> om_photo-50x76_500x760mm [HP20210302]
I’ve checked some photo print services, they are offering a poster size of nominal 50cm by 75cm, but not 76cm.
> om_photo-60x90_600x900mm [HP20210302]
> media-supported (1setOf (type2 keyword | name(MAX))) [RFC8011]
> < all name values >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20210319/691915a3/attachment.html>