Smith,
Yes, I had those corrections already queued up, and send them off to Ira yesterday...
> On Oct 14, 2021, at 11:26 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
>> Hi again,
>> I noticed that we let another set of typos slip through. These all have an underscore between "photo" and the size descriptor ("12r") but it should have been a dash to be consistent with other "oe_photo" sizes registered previously.
>> Current names:
>> oe_photo_12r_12x15in
> oe_photo_24r_24x31.5in
> oe_photo_30r_30x40in
>> Updated names:
>> oe_photo-12r_12x15in
> oe_photo-24r_24x31.5in
> oe_photo-30r_30x40in
>> Can these be fixed in the next IANA update?
>> Smith
>> /**
> Smith Kennedy
> HP Inc.
> */
>>> On May 28, 2021, at 10:57 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
>>>> Signed PGP part
>> Thank you!
>>>>>>> On May 28, 2021, at 7:33 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet at msweet.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Smith,
>>>>>> Sure, I'll make a note for my next IANA registry update and update the PWG registry now...
>>>>>> > On May 28, 2021, at 9:24 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Mike,
>>> >
>>> > We already registered the below keywords, but it was pointed out to me that we let a typo slip through.
>>> >
>>> > Registered but incorrect ==> "na_arch-e1_32x40in"
>>> > Corrected ==> "na_arch-e1_30x42in"
>>> >
>>> > Can you please update the registry?
>>> >
>>> > Smith
>>> >
>>> > /**
>>> > Smith Kennedy
>>> > HP Inc.
>>> > */
>>> >
>>> >> On Apr 8, 2021, at 2:54 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> All,
>>> >>
>>> >> So to clean up HP's registration based on all of the feedback so far (comments in parenthesis from the original request):
>>> >>
>>> >> Attributes (attribute syntax)
>>> >> Keyword Attribute Value Reference
>>> >> -------------------------------------------------------- --------------
>>> >> media (type2 keyword | name(MAX)) [RFC8011]
>>> >> na_arch-e1_32x40in [HP20210302]
>>> >> oe_photo-s8r_8x12in [HP20210302] (added)
>>> >> oe_photo_12r_12x15in [HP20210302] (added, renamed to 12R)
>>> >> oe_photo-14x18_14x18in [HP20210302]
>>> >> oe_photo-16r_16x20in [HP20210302] (renamed to 16R)
>>> >> oe_photo-22x28_22x28in [HP20210302]
>>> >> oe_photo-22r_22x29.5in [HP20210302] (added)
>>> >> oe_photo-24x30_24x30in [HP20210302]
>>> >> oe_photo_24r_24x31.5in [HP20210302] (added)
>>> >> oe_photo_30r_30x40in [HP20210302] (added)
>>> >> om_photo-30x40_300x400mm [HP20210302] (renamed to centimeter dimensions)
>>> >> om_photo-30x45_300x450mm [HP20210302] (renamed to centimeter dimensions)
>>> >> om_photo-35x46_350x460mm [HP20210302] (renamed to centimeter dimensions)
>>> >> om_photo-40x60_400x600mm [HP20210302] (renamed to centimeter dimensions)
>>> >> om_photo-50x75_500x750mm [HP20210302] (added, common poster size?)
>>> >> om_photo-50x76_500x760mm [HP20210302] (renamed to centimeter dimensions)
>>> >> om_photo-60x90_600x900mm [HP20210302] (renamed to centimeter dimensions)
>>> >>
>>> >> Thoughts?
>>> >>
>>> >> ________________________
>>> >> Michael Sweet
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> ipp mailing list
>>> >> ipp at pwg.org>>> >> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>> >
>>>>>> ________________________
>>> Michael Sweet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
________________________
Michael Sweet