Thanks for the clarification, not sure how I missed this :)
From: Michael Sweet <msweet at msweet.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2026 3:54 PM
To: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp at pwg.org>
Cc: Michael Ziller <mziller at microsoft.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IPP] RFC8011 is ambiguous for 'compression' attribute
Michael,
On Feb 5, 2026, at 4:37 PM, Michael Ziller via ipp <ipp at pwg.org<mailto:ipp at pwg.org>> wrote:
create-job simply defers to print-job as far as attributes supplied: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8011#section-4.2.4
The first paragraph of section 4.2.4 (Create-Job) says (highlighting is mine):
This RECOMMENDED operation is similar to the Print-Job operation
(Section 4.2.1), except that in the Create-Job request, a Client does
not supply Document data or any reference to Document data. Also,
the Client does not supply any of the "document-name",
"document-format", "compression", or "document-natural-language"
operation attributes. This operation is followed by one or more
Send-Document or Send-URI operations. In each of those operation
requests, the Client MAY supply the "document-name",
"document-format", and "document-natural-language" attributes for
each Document in the Job.
________________________
Michael Sweet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20260206/7212ada6/attachment.html>