At 07:21 02/25/97 PST, Bob Pentecost wrote:
>Unfortunately, I may completely miss the JMP phone conference today. If I
>can free up some time, I'll join you. However, I do have a couple of
>comments.
>>Re: Keith Carter's "Job MIB Assessment".
>* Page 58 - jmJobName, jmJobIdName, jmJobIdNumber,
>jmJobComment: Clarify the use of these objects. Here is an
>example. A user submits a print job. The file name of the
>job is "C:\MYJOB.PS". The user specifies a comment of
>"Status Report 1/31/97". The print job is queued on server
>"SERVER1" in print queue "PSQUEUE". The numeric job id is
>1234. What value is the value of each object? Do we need a
>specific object for source server and source queue to
>accommodate management applications such as the management
>application provided by HP that correlates jobs in a printer
>with jobs in a print queue on a print server?
>>It looks like the print queue name is covered by jmJobDeviceNameRequested.
Agreed. To clarify, I changed the name to:
jmJobDeviceNameOrQueueRequested and the description.
>However, it looks like there's no place for the source server or client
>name. We should also try to provide the file name of the job and a source
>port object which tell which client port the job came from.
I added these as Issues 59 and 60. We need specific proposals for these
objects or attributes.
>>We just held an internal review of the Job Monitoring MIB. I'll try to get
>the issues posted by the end of this week.
>>Bob Pentecost
>HP
>>>>>