At 09:04 05/12/97 PDT, Harry Lewis wrote:
Snip..
>Nor do I agree with the following statement (not sure who wrote this - my
>mailer did not find any name attached)
Harry,
I wrote that. See the file attr-tab.doc .pdf that I posted in the
/pub/pwg/jmp/contributions sub-directory last Friday.
>>>If you buy the categorization of the attributes in attr-tab, there are only
>>4 out of 78 attributes that are there only for accounting-only (A):
>>jobAccountName(16), printQualityUsed(39), tonerEconomyUsed(41), and
>>tonerDensityUsed(43). The rest are there for monitoring jobs only (M) or
>>are there for both monitoring and accounting (MA).
>>I don't "buy" that only 4 of 78 are for accounting only. We obviously have some
>major philosophical differences regarding the use of the Job MIB which need to
>be address in San Diego.
I'd be interested in which additional attributes
you think are for accounting *only*, i.e. are not also useful for job
monitoring? Take a look at the attr-tab.doc .pdf file.
Should we put review of the attr-tab.doc .pdf file on the agenda for
San Diego?
>>Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
>>