I certainly can agree. I was rather wondering about all the
discussion. It was my understanding that objects can be mandatory, not
values of the object variable.
Bill Wagner, Osicom/DPI
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are ther
Author: JK Martin <jkm at underscore.com> at Internet
Date: 5/27/97 2:16 PM
Ron,
> The object jmJobState should be mandatory. All possible enums for this
> object must be reported if implemented and available to the agent. (I
> sent another email on this subject with more info earlier today.)
>> Does this make more sense?
Yes! I like your wording. Can everyone else agree to this?
...jay