JMP> Comments regarding Comments from Xerox Developers

JMP> Comments regarding Comments from Xerox Developers

Ron Bergman rbergma at dpc.com
Thu Jun 26 14:54:37 EDT 1997


ISSUE 88 - Add jmGeneralNumberOfJobsProcessed


Since this proposed object has the same range as jmJobIndex, it
does not provide any added value.  It will always be equal to
jmJobIndex.






ISSUE 89 - Add jmGeneralAttributesImplemented object with bits for
each attribute implemented


I do not know how valuable this object would be to a management
application.  Unless Jay Martin and David Kellerman indicate strong
support, I would reject this request.






ISSUE 90 - The (MANDATORY) OCTET STRING objects should have a
minimum MAX size required


ISSUE 91 - The MANDATORY jobOwner attribute should have a minimum
MAX size required




I do not have a strong opinion on these issues.  I would support
this as long as a strong objection is not raised






More on the other issues later.




	Ron Bergman



More information about the Jmp mailing list