Don,
> After much thought and reading of the mail, I personally have come
> to the conclusion that in the case of MIBs, operating under the IETF
> (even if it were possible) does not really buy us anything.
Note that, to date, there have been no objections whatsoever to
the notion of having the PWG maintain its own standards. This is
a good sign, I believe.
> On a more technical note, I would suggest that we
> consider moving the Job MIB down one level in the
> OID space. I would prefer something like
>> ..... 2699.1.1...... Job Mib
> ......2699.1.2...... Finisher MIB
>> ...... 2699.2.1 ...... maybe IPP space?
> ...... 2699.3.1 ..... something else using OID space
>> etc.
What is your thinking here? I mean, what is the significance
of putting JMP/FIN under ...2699.1 versus having IPP under .3,
etc? Are you in some way suggesting a set of categories for
the top-level OID (ie, .2699.1, .2699.2, etc)?
This approach sounds good to me; it's just that I'm trying to
figure out your plan here.
...jay
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- JK Martin | Email: jkm at underscore.com --
-- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000 --
-- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699 --
-- Hudson, NH 03051-4915 | Web: http://www.underscore.com --
----------------------------------------------------------------------