Hi,
I propose that we add all of the required and optional
IDS HCD Health Assessment Attributes to the System
object in Semantic Model/2.0 XML Schema.
We had a short, lively discussion about this today during
our IDS WG call. Bill Wagner observed that some IDS
Health Attributes may belong in individual Services.
I agree, but it is the single host system endpoint (System
object in SM/2.0) that makes health assertions in any
of the existing network endpoint attachment protocols.
Should we do this mapping work (to PWG XML Schema)
in the MFD WG? Or the IDS WG?
Comments?
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
email: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
winter:
579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
734-944-0094
summer:
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20090604/55a1f63d/attachment-0001.html>