All,
Here are comments I have for the MFD Requirements document so far.
Section 1
Line 166-168 ? ?Although it is not one of the modeling documents to be
offered as a PWG standard, the XML representation of the MFD Model in PWG
Semantic Model 2.0 (REF) is the schematic representation of the entire MFD
Services model.?
1) MFD Model and Semantics is a subset of PWG Semantic Model 2.0?
2) The ?PWG Semantic Model 2.0? document does not exist yet ? recommend to
remove it or change to ?the XML representation of PWG Semantic Model 2.0?
and provide the reference to the latest schema ZIP file.
Here are the rationales -
All MFD individual service specifications need to wait for the MFD Overall
Model and Semantics specification to be approved, before they can be moved
to any Last Call.
Yet I don?t believe the MFD Overall document can be approved without the
approval of this MFD Requirements document. By referencing the PWG
Semantic Model 2.0, the requirement document need to depend on the
referenced PWG Semantic Model 2.0 which does not exist yet.
The truth is that PWG Semantic Model 1.0 was a generalization from
IPP/1.1. It was approved several years after IPP/1.1 finally was
approved. PWG Semantic Model 2.0 is following the same path, it cannot be
finalized until MFD Model and Semantics is approved as a standard.
Looking at all these processes and timelines, if this MFD requirement
document is depend on PWG Semantic Model 2.0 standard, we are really
waiting for years before any of the MFD service spec can be approved!!!!
Line 169 ? ?The Semantic Model structure lends itself to automatic code
generation????? => I think it more correct to state that the XML Schema
representation of the Semantic Model structure lends itself to automatic
generation by available XML tools in the market.
Section 2.1
Line 179 - ?ners? => scanners????
Section 2.2
Line 227 ? The IPP formed the basis for PWG Semantic Model 1.0 =>
recommend to clearly specify ?IPP/1.1?. Because IPP/2.0 formed the basis
for MFD Model and Semantics, that in turn forms the basis for PWG Semantic
Model 2.0, according to our current approach in these PWG Model and
Semantics standards, right????
Line 244 ? any reason for Consumer to be capitalized?
Section 2.3.3
Line 302 ? Semantic Model V2 models all MFD Services => Maybe it?s more
correct to state that Semantic Model V2 include modeling of all MFD
Services?
Line 311 ? ?Semantic Model V2 also suggests a way to address the
bothersome issue of the plethora of device drivers? => Is this somebody?s
imaginary claim? Without the approved document or any interim document,
would there be issues with we arbitrarily make the claim in a published
standard?
Section 3.1
Line 386 ? Semantic Model => v2 ??? Again, if yes, please remove.
Section 3.2.3
Line 410-412 ? ?although much of the model will also be applicable to SOHO
level applications, it is not intended to suggest that services at that
level to be fully compatible with the models.?=> what are the models
implied here? Is it acceptable that SOHO MFD services not compatible with
PWG MFD model standard for that market?
Line 560 ? (1) Sub-Section number need to increase one level : 4.4=> 4.3.3
(2) Walk-Up Batch => missing ?Scan? at the end???
Line 627 ? Use Case 4 => Use Case 5
Line 657 ? Use Case 5 => Use Case 6
-Nancy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy Chen
Principal Engineer
Solutions and Technology
Oki Data
2000 Bishops Gate Blvd.
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
Phone: (856)222-7006
Email: Nancy.Chen at okidata.com
"Zehler, Peter" <Peter.Zehler at xerox.com>
Sent by: mfd-bounces at pwg.org
05/20/2010 09:35 AM
To
"Zehler, Peter" <Peter.Zehler at xerox.com>, <mfd at pwg.org>
cc
Subject
[MFD] RE: MFD teleconference Thursday 5/20 at 3:00 PM EST (12:00 PM PST)
Apparently this did not get to the DL.
Peter Zehler
Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
From: Zehler, Peter
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 3:04 PM
To: mfd at pwg.org
Subject: MFD teleconference Thursday 5/20 at 3:00 PM EST (12:00 PM PST)
There will be an MFD conference call at 3:00 PM EST (12:00 PM PST)
Thursday May 20. Below is the proposed agenda
The meeting is held in accord with the PWG Intellectual Property Policy.
Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570
Attendee access code: (by request only, please contact me if you do not
have it)
Agenda:
1. Identify Minute Taker
2. Approval of minutes from last meeting
<ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/minutes/pwg-mfd-minutes-20100506.pdf>
3. Agenda bashing
4. Discuss MFD Requirements document (focus on use cases)
<ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/wd/wd-mfdreq10-20100517.pdf>
5. Discuss Face to Face agenda
6. Next steps
Click Here to Join Live Meeting
<https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join?id=PWG_MFD&role=attend&pw=PQ%
25%3EFj5sN>
Peter Zehler
Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
mfd mailing list
mfd at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20100520/9af3ed22/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20100520/9af3ed22/attachment.htm>