I agree with Greg and Danny; the right thing to do is to have
an overview session at the TA meeting and still have the regular
working group meeting in Seattle (where real work will happen.)
Don
To: p1394%pwg.org @ interlock.lexmark.com @ SMTP
cc: gregory_leclair%erc.epson.com @ interlock.lexmark.com @ SMTP (bcc: Don
Wright)
From: gregory_leclair%erc.epson.com @ interlock.lexmark.com ("gregory leclair")
@ SMTP
Date: 05/19/97 06:17:26 PM
Subject: P1394> 1394 PWG July/August Meeting
Folks,
My thinking has been that meetings held off cycle from PWG meeting are a
method of gathering feedback from other parties who might not attend PWG
meetings. As such, I expect that this type of meeting is informal and may
only last 1-2 hours.
The plan we discussed in San Diego is:
* To have a 1394 PWG meeting at the TA meeting in San Jose on 7/31 or 8/1.
* PWG is scheduled to meet in Seattle / Redmond starting on 8/4.
Since these two meeting are very close, I'd like to confirm how we will
proceed:
1. 1-2 hour meeting at TA San Jose meeting and regular two day session
at PWG Seattle meeting.
2. 2 day meeting at TA San Jose meeting and no 1394 meeting at PWG
Seattle meeting.
3. No TA San Jose meeting and regular two day session at PWG Seattle
meeting.
My feeling is to keep the plan as per #1. Please reply with your comments.
Regards,
Greg LeClair
______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: P1394> 1394PWG July/August Meeting
Author: Larry Stein <lstein at fapo.com> at Internet
Date: 5/19/97 9:28 AM
Greg,
If the 1394PWG will have a meeting at the 1394TA in San Jose on 7/31- 8/1,
does this mean that we will not be meeting with the PWG the week of 8/4 in
Seattle?
-Larry
*****************************************************************************
Larry A. Stein Phone: (619)292-2740
Warp Nine Engineering Fax: (619)292-8020
Web: http://www.fapo.com
*****************************************************************************