Hi,
I got these as personal mail from Anubhav Saxena. Forwarded
for the experts to respond to...
Cheers,
- Ira McDonald
High North Inc
PS - Anubhav - To post to the list, send mail to 'ps at pwg.org'.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anubhav Saxena [mailto:anubhav.saxena at wipro.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:11 AM
To: McDonald Ira
Subject: RE: PS> FW: LISA Forum Europe - November 4-7, 2002 in
Heidelberg, Germany
Hi,
I am Anubhav from Wipro, India. I am interested in your specification of PSI
and I am subscribed to the mailing list as well.
I am sorry if I am not supposed to post in message on PSI to you this way,
however I assure you that once I know the protocol, I will stick to it.
Following is my comment on the Requirement Specs of PSI.
After reading the speicification document I see a note on page 17. This is
actually an issue "How does the mobile device know that it can use Model 3
instead of needing use model 2".
I see the following options:
a) Model 2 is one, wherein the mobile device is
1. more capable than in model 3 (hence is probably costlier)
b) Model 2 is one, wherein the print service is
1. capable of handling lesser channels of simultaneous
communications than in model 3
2. for some reason not able to talk to printer
Hence i feel that a mobile will need to take a decision to go in for 2/3
based on
1. Existing protocol support on the mobile itself
2. May be depending of the level of support provided by the print
services
3. Current load on the mobile/print service
However I am not sure about other issues that may be underlying this.
Best Regards,
Anubhav.
-------------- next part --------------
**************************Disclaimer**************************************************
Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is 'privileged'
and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is
addressed. You are notified that any use, copying or dissemination of the information
contained in the E-MAIL in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited.
****************************************************************************************