PS> Soap with attachments - relation to SOAP 1.1

[Harry Lewis]

Actually, I think that DIME had more momentum at one point but I believe 
the focus is now on SOAP w/attachments (including Microsoft and IBM). 
> > http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/jeffsch/paswa/paswa61.html
> > http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/jeffsch/paswa/paswa61.pdf
> > http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/jeffsch/paswa/paswa62.doc
---------------------------------------------- 
Harry Lewis 
IBM Printing Systems 
---------------------------------------------- 




"REVEL,DAN (HP-Vancouver,ex1)" <dan_revel at hp.com>
03/19/2003 10:21 AM
 
        To:     Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS, ps at pwg.org
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: PS> Soap with attachments - relation to SOAP 
1.1


SOAP-attachments was a W3C submission, Microsoft et al. made a competing 
proposal, DIME, that seems to have more momentum:
 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwebsrv/html/dimewsattch.asp
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl at us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 9:59 AM
To: ps at pwg.org
Subject: PS> Soap with attachments - relation to SOAP 1.1


See http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP-attachments section 4. Seems this has been 
around for quite a while. I suspect we'd have better interop than we 
anticipate. 
---------------------------------------------- 
Harry Lewis 
IBM Printing Systems 
---------------------------------------------- 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/ps/attachments/20030402/fe0e51ca/attachment-0001.html