Hi Harry,
A quick few thoughts.
PSI is NOT at all SOAP-specific (the WSDL could easily
generate pure HTTP bindings), but PSI is RPC-style and
stateful (like all IETF, PWG, and vendor print protocols),
which is the exact opposite of REST.
>From my reading of REST descriptions, it appears REST
is verb-poor and noun-rich and stateless. Neither PSI,
nor any other real print protocol is stateless - and I can't
imagine any easy transform to get there (or why you'd
want to).
Since there is consistency in available descriptions of
REST, designing RESTful applications seems to be a
statement in the eye of the beholder.
Would you care to expand on the reason for your
question?
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - FSG Open Printing Steering Committee
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ps at pwg.org [mailto:owner-ps at pwg.org]On Behalf Of Harry Lewis
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 1:15 PM
To: ps at pwg.org
Subject: PS> REST version of PSI
Is PSI so SOAP specific that a REST version would be out of the question?
What basic steps are needed to migrate PSI from SOAP to REST?
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM STSM
Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
http://www.pwg.org
IBM Printing Systems
http://www.ibm.com/printers
303-924-5337
----------------------------------------------
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.7/620 - Release Date: 1/8/2007
4:12 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/ps/attachments/20070108/8ec2c799/attachment.html