Hi,
Please remember to send a note to the MFD WG email list
(mfd at pwg.org) acknowledging that you have reviewed this
specification.
The PWG Process *requires* a quorum (30% of voting PWG
members) to reply, before any document can exit PWG Last
Call.
Please format the subject line of your acknowledgement
exactly as follows:
<company> has reviewed MFD Requirements and has <no comments | comments>
Include your comments in the email body.
Thanks very much,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
winter:
579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
734-944-0094
summer:
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:33 PM, <wamwagner at comcast.net> wrote:
>> All,
> This is an announcement to begin the Last Call process for the
> "Multifunction Device Service Model Requirements" statement. This
> document is a "clear statement of requirements for the standard to be
> produced" and is required by the PWG Process
> (ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/pwg-process-30.pdf) in conjunction with
> generating a standard. There will be, in fact, some ten MFD Service Model
> standards. Two of these have had the requirements statements incorporated in
> the standard and have already been advanced to PWG Candidate Standard. The
> MFD Working Group has decided that an integrated requirements statement
> would not only be more efficient, but would best reflect the consistent
> approach to modeling the different MFD imaging and ancillary services. The
> Last Call will close on Friday July 9.
>> Please review this document, accessible at
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/wd/wd-mfdreq10-20100609 and provide your
> comments (or statement of no comments) to the MFD mail list (mfd at pwg.org).
> As identified in the PWG Process Document, the "requirements statement is
> important as it leads to a clear, common understanding of the goals,
> provides a guide for developing the standard, and can be used as a final
> test to measure the completeness of the resulting specification." All
> comments will be addressed and resolved prior to the statement being put up
> for ballot. Note that PWG approval of this requirements statement is
> required before the remaining MFD specifications can be approved.
>> Thanks,
>> Bill Wagner/Peter Zehler
>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> _______________________________________________
> pwg-announce mailing list
>pwg-announce at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce>>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.