>From: <mailto:norbertschade at oaktech.com>Norbert Schade
>To: <mailto:upd at pwg.org>UPD group
>Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:26 AM
>Subject: consistent Predefined_ID, Proprietary_ID
>>I wonder whether it would further help us, if we'd equip all features with
>Predefined_ID/Proprietary_ID.
>One reason we didn't so far is that some features need to classifying
>attributes for a proper description. Samples are all features, which are
>mainly described depending on horizontal and vertical resolution.
>There is a solution, if we want.
>We could specify some simple syntax, which we can more or less borrow from
>the Media Standardized Names spec.
>Checking device resolution the keywords could look like 'resolution_12x12'
>(still related to the virtual units like 7200). So this would represent a
>600 dpi resolution.
>Haven't thought about it thoroughly, but just an idea.
>Eventually we could end up with classifying Predefined_ID/Proprietary_ID
>attributes in all features.
>>any feeling?
>>Regards
>Norbert Schade
>Principal Software Engineer
>Advanced Development / Connectivity
>Oak Technology, Inc.
>10 Presidential Way
>Woburn, MA 01801
>USA
>Phone: 1-781-638-7614
>Fax: 1-781-638-7555
>email: <mailto:norbertschade at oaktech.com>norbertschade at oaktech.com
mailto:sommer at granitesystems.com
978-486-3068
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/upd/attachments/20011004/a2f25420/attachment-0001.html