XP> New Version of Document

XP> New Version of Document

Jun Fujisawa fujisawa.jun at canon.co.jp
Sat Mar 9 04:21:10 EST 2002


Don,

At 10:05 AM -0500 02.3.8, don at lexmark.com wrote:
>1) The word "Basic" was added to be consistent with the working in the XHTML
>Basic document.  People were having trouble knowing what was and what was not
>additional function on top of XHTML Basic.  I wanted to use **exactly** 
>the same
>wording as XHTML Basic to make sure it is absolutely clear.

There is no point to add the word "Basic" to the module category
names since they represent both "Basic" and "Full" versions of
modules.

- Table Modules
     Basic Tables Module
     Tables Module
- Forms Modules
     Basic Forms Module
     Forms Module

If you really want to use **exactly** the same wording as XHTML
Basic, you might want to stop the use of category names entirely
("Core Modules", "Text Extension Modules", "Table Modules",
and "Forms Modules").

Also, I noticed "Basic Table Module" should be written as "Basic
Tables Module".


--
Jun Fujisawa
<mailto:fujisawa.jun at canon.co.jp>



More information about the Xp mailing list