Bob is making good progress in getting the multiplexed/interleaved publishes
as an RFC.
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Herriot [mailto:bob at herriot.com]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 22:28
To: Hastings, Tom N
Subject: Re: What is the status of multiplexed/interleaved?
Ned said on June 21:
"The changes you made seem fine; I've asked that the document be added to
next week's IESG agenda."
I await the IESG comments.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hastings, Tom N" <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>
To: "Herriot, Bob" <bob at herriot.com>
Cc: "Hastings, Tom" <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>; "Lewis, Harry"
<harryl at us.ibm.com>; "Zehler, Peter" <PZehler at crt.xerox.com>; "Wright, Don"
<don at lexmark.com>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 6:50 PM
Subject: What is the status of multiplexed/interleaved?
> Bob,
>> You mentioned on the phone that Ned was sounding more like he would
publish
> multiplexed/interleaved as a RFC?
>> Would it be Informational?
>> What is its status and when do you think it will be published?
>> At the PWG meeting last week, Peter signed me up to find out its status.
>> The application/pwg-xhtml-print+xml document is still citing it in a
> normative way. Also
>> Thanks,
> Tom
>>