I forgot to cc the list.
---------------------- Forwarded by Don Wright/Lex/Lexmark on 08/15/2002 02:19
PM ---------------------------
Don Wright
08/15/2002 02:19 PM
To: "BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1)" <jim_bigelow%hp.com at interlock.lexmark.com> @
LEXMTA
cc:
Subject: Re: XP> character entities and XHTML-Print (Document link: Don
Wright)
I agree with you, Jim. We need to use the XHTML 1.0 set.
**********************************************
Don Wright don at lexmark.com
Member, IEEE SA Standards Board
PatCom Chair, SCC Liaison
Member, IEEE-ISTO Board of Directors
f.wright at ieee.org / f.wright at computer.org
Director, Alliances & Standards
Lexmark International
740 New Circle Rd
Lexington, Ky 40550
859-825-4808 (phone) 603-963-8352 (fax)
**********************************************
"BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1)" <jim_bigelow%hp.com at interlock.lexmark.com> on
08/13/2002 07:50:30 PM
To: xp%pwg.org at interlock.lexmark.com
cc: (bcc: Don Wright/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: XP> character entities and XHTML-Print
Hello,
I've been trying to understand which set of pre-defined character entities
are applicable to XHTML-Print: the xml or the XHTML 1.0 set.
One of my colleagues says it is the smaller, xml set. I think it is the
XHTML 1.0 set.
Here's my reasoning, see what you think:
1. XHTML-Print is in the family of XHTML document types since it is created
by combining XHTML modules.
(http://www.pwg.org/xhtml-print/HTML-Version/XHTML-Print.html#s1.1)
2. The DTDs and entity sets attached to the XHTML 1.0 specs "form a
normative part of this specification."
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/#dtds)
3. Therefore, the entity sets in XHTML 1.0 should be supported in
XHTML-Print unless the XHTML-Print spec states otherwise.
Comments?
Jim Bigelow
Hewlett-Packard