Hello Elliott,
At 3:48 PM -0500 02.10.31, ElliottBradshaw at oaktech.com wrote:
>XHTML-Print
>-----------------
>>2. Section 1.3.1. I agree with the yellow-text suggestion to remove the
>sentence "A generic event handling...".
I agree with you and Jim.
>4. Section 1.3.3. There is no user input. How about a summary here of
>the material in section 4.5.
Yes. This section does not currently have meaningful information concerning
printing. I suggest to change the description to something like this:
"Basic XHTML forms, section 5.5.1 [XHTMLMOD] are supported. Note that a
printer print a static version of a form, and the visual appearance of a form
depends heavily on the implementation."
>5. Section 2.1. Since PWG is a real organization and xhtml-print.org is
>just a URL, probably PWG is a better name for the doctype. (but not a big
>deal)
I propose that we will use the following System Identifier:
SYSTEM "http://www.pwg.org/xhtml-print/xhtml-print10.dtd"
>7. Section 4.2. This refers to a discussion of e.g. & and < in style
>sheets, which I could not find.
The last sentence in Section 4.2 does not make sense to me ether.
--
Jun Fujisawa
<mailto:fujisawa.jun at canon.co.jp>