Hello all,
>We need to discuss this proposal before adding it to the specification.
I think so.
I am sorry additional request of some CSS values.
Our original request are lack some CSS values for DTV.
So we would like to discuss this proposal that these CSS values adding to CSS Print Enhanced column.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1)
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:32 AM
>> ...
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Miyazawa Shunsaku [mailto:Miyazawa.Shunsaku at exc.epson.co.jp]
>> >
>> > ... Thanks for adding DTV enhancement set to the extended layout
>> > enhancement . I look over current CSS Print Enhanced ,so I
>> > recognize I had forgotten to request some CSS values as CSS
>> > Print Enhanced.
>> >
>> > DTV request follows CSS values , a few more
>> > 1. "right" value for "text-align" property.
>> > 2. "landscape" value for "size" property.
>> > 3. "lower latin" and "upper latin" values for "
>> > list-style-type" property.
>> >
>> > So, we would like to add these CSS values as CSS
>> Print Enhanced.
>>>> Miyazawa-san,
>>>> Thank you for the corrections. I will add these corrections
>> to the CSS Print Profile.
>My response above, that I would add text-align:right, size: landscape, and
>list-style-type, was based on the thought that these requests were part of
>the original request made at the November 5, 2002 meeting (See
>http://www.pwg.org/xhtml-print/minutes/Minutes-November-2002.html).
>However, when I reread those materials
>(http://www.pwg.org/xhtml-print/minutes/xhtml-avc.pdf and
>http://www.pwg.org/xhtml-print/minutes/CSSprintenhanced-XHTMLforDTVprint.pdf>) I do not see a request for these values.
>I think that we must discuss whether these values should be added or not and
>that members of the working group must decide.
>The value "right" for text-align has not included in the CSS Print Profile
>because it is thought to be too complex for low cost printers.
>The value "landscape" for the size property has, also, not been included in
>the CSS Print Profile because low cost printer may not have enough memory to
>rotate a page from portrait to landscape.
>The values of "lower latin" and "upper latin" for the list-style-type have
>not been include, but I do not know the reasoning. Perhaps someone from the
>working group can indicate why these have not been part of the
>specification.
Shunsaku Miyazawa
SEIKO EPSON