Dave,
You wrote:
>> I don't think that we need to attempt to modify RFC3391,
> because that RFC attempt to be very general and evades the
> issue of what's in the headers for each message. Instead, I
> think that the usage of the Content-Disposition header should
> be documented in the xhtml-print specification itself.
>> Then we register the new RFC2183 Content-Disposition
> parameter types. (The new registered types will appear at the
> following URL).
>http://www.iana.org/assignments/mail-cont-disp
Thanks for the clarification!
Jim Bigelow
Hewlett-Packard
208-396-2068
jim.bigelow at hp.com