XP> [CSS3 Print] New feature proposal: 'fit' and 'fit-position'

XP> [CSS3 Print] New feature proposal: 'fit' and 'fit-position'

don at lexmark.com don at lexmark.com
Fri Sep 22 07:40:41 EDT 2006


Melinda:
 
At this point in time, we have no opinion on this change. 
 
***************************************************************************
 Don Wright                     don at lexmark.com
                                f.wright at ieee.org / f.wright at computer.org
 Director of Standards
 Lexmark International          INCITS Executive Board Vice-Chair
 C14/082-3                      IEEE SA Standards Board Past Chair
 740 New Circle Rd              IEEE SASB Patent Committee Chair 
 Lexington, Ky 40550            Member: IEEE SA Board of Governors
 859-825-4808 (phone)           Member: IEEE CS SAB & W3C AC
 603-963-8352 (fax)             Director, IEEE-ISTO
***************************************************************************
 




"Grant, Melinda" <melinda.grant at hp.com>
Sent by: owner-xp at pwg.org
09/13/2006 08:58 PM
 
        To:     <xp at pwg.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        XP> [CSS3 Print] New feature proposal: 'fit' and 
'fit-position'


The CSS3 Box module contains two features that HP believes would be quite 
valuable for the CSS Print solution space, namely 'fit' and 
'fit-position'.  See http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-box#fit for a description.
 
These features would be a valuable addition to CSS Print, because they 
enable very easy positioning of images within boxes, something those of us 
who have worked on templates know requires lots of messy computation and 
numeric values with the currently required feature set.
 
Adding new requirements to CSS Print will cause us to retreat from CR 
(Candidate Recommendation) status to LCWD (Last Call Working Draft) status 
for at least three weeks.  Since CSS Print is waiting on CSS 2.1 to 
advance beyond CR, this short setback won't affect its completion 
schedule.
 
Neither would this additional requirement affect current standards such as 
UPnP Print Enhanced or Bluetooth BPP.  They both point to the current CR 
specification, and this of course won't change.  However, new standards 
could point to a new CR version, thereby requiring additional feature 
support.
 
Questions have been raised about whether multiple levels of conformance in 
the market would create interoperability problems.  It would not, because 
the change is b/w compatible (nothing is being taken away), and support 
for the new standard(s) would indicate support for the new features.
 
If you have objections to this proposed change, or wish to express 
support, please post your opinion here or to www-style at w3.org by September 
23.
 
Best wishes,
 
Melinda

  _____ 

HP  -   Melinda Grant
Connectivity Standards 
Consumer Printing and Imaging
+1 (541) 582-3681
melinda.grant at hp.com 
  _____ 

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/xp/attachments/20060922/4232f020/attachment.html


More information about the Xp mailing list