No kidding!!
I think my first choices would have been 'fit' instead of 'meet' and
'fill' instead of 'slice'. But since the property is called 'fit' and
the default stretch-to-fit is called 'fill', I guess I don't get my
first choice. ;-)
People seem to be leaning toward fill, none, meet, and cover as opposed
to fill, hidden, meet, and slice; but I wouldn't bet a nickel at this
point. ;-)
Best.
Melinda
________________________________
From: Elliott Bradshaw [mailto:Elliott.Bradshaw at Zoran.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 5:58 PM
To: Grant, Melinda
Cc: xp at pwg.org
Subject: RE: XP> [css3 page] 'fit'
Hi Melinda,
Zoran supports pretty much any alternative to the keyword
"hidden" in this context. The heck with precedent :^)
Thanks,
E.
________________________________
From: owner-xp at pwg.org [mailto:owner-xp at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Grant, Melinda
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:33 PM
To: xp at pwg.org
Subject: XP> [css3 page] 'fit'
The 'fit' property was discussed at length during last week's
CSS WG face-to-face meeting.
Based on those discussions, I would not be surprised if:
a) the value names were to change;
b) the property were to be extended to cover cases where height
and/or width is 'auto'.
You might choose to wait until the spec returns to CR before
completing design and beginning implementation.
Best wishes,
Melinda
_____
HP - Melinda Grant
Connectivity Standards
Consumer Printing and Imaging
+1 (541) 582-3681
melinda.grant at hp.com
_____
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/xp/attachments/20061018/8084738f/attachment.html