I have no objection to this addition, but could you explain? I understand
saddle stitch. What is saddle stitch bottom?
Ron Bergman
Dataproducts Corp.
On Thu, 3 Sep 1998, Kevin Palmer wrote:
> If we are to change, should we not include:
> saddleStitchBottom(14)
> Kevin
>
> ----------
> From: Ron Bergman
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 1998 6:32 PM
> To: fin@pwg.org
> Subject: FIN> Alignment of Xerox IPP Attributes with FIN MIB
>
> Xerox is requesting the registration of several new IPP
> attributes that fall within the scope of the Finisher MIB.
> Four of these new attributes are not currently supported in
> the Finisher MIB. They are:
>
> staple-dual-top
> staple-dual-bottom
> staple-dual-left
> staple-dual-right
>
> Also, the Finisher MIB "FinStitchingTypeTC" contains the
> enum "stitch(10)" which is not included in the Xerox set.
> This appears to be a generic enum which was to have been
> replaced by "other(1)". I propose that "stitch(10)" be
> removed.
>
> The revised "FinStitchingTypeTC" enum set would be:
>
>
> other(1),
> unknown(2),
> stapleTopLeft(4),
> stapleBottomLeft(5),
> stapleTopRight(6),
> stapleBottomRight(7),
> saddleStitch(8),
> edgeStitch(9),
> stapleDualTop(10),
> stapleDualBottom(11),
> stapleDualLeft(12),
> stapleDualRight(13)
>
> Comments?
>
>
> Ron Bergman
> Dataproducts Corp.
>
>
>