FIN Mail Archive: RE: FIN> FW: Print finisher mib

RE: FIN> FW: Print finisher mib

From: McDonald, Ira (IMcDonald@crt.xerox.com)
Date: Tue Oct 30 2001 - 12:39:03 EST

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "FIN> FW: Lint output on Finisher MIB"

    Hi Ron,

    I'll take a look at this and any reply you think is appropriate
    to Dave Harrington - at least Bert Wijnen seems to have helped
    get the ball rolling again.

    Cheers,
    - Ira McDonald, consulting architect at Xerox
      High North Inc

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Bergman, Ron [mailto:Ron.Bergman@Hitachi-hkis.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:54 AM
    To: Ira McDonald (E-mail)
    Cc: 'fin@pwg.org'
    Subject: FIN> FW: Print finisher mib

    One more time.
     
        Ron
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Harrington, David [mailto:dbh@enterasys.com]
    Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 5:47 PM
    To: Bert Wijnen (E-mail); 'Ron.Bergman@Hitachi-hkis.com'
    Subject: Print finisher mib

    Hi,
    comments on finisher mib 12
    Issue 6: The second paragraph of 5.2 is still incorrect. For security
    reasons, not implementation reasons, it is possible that, **due to
    administrative configuration**, not all objetcs will be accessible. SNMP
    requires certain error codes or exception codes be returned. One cannot
    design the mib to avoid this. The behavior as described will be
    non-compliant to SNMP rules.
    Issue 4 still exists in section 5.2.
    The security section discusses making objects read-only to make them secure.
    This may or may not be adequate. This can prevent them from being modifed,
    but it doesn't prevent disclosure of the information to unauthorized
    personnel. Making the object read-only also makes them far less useful,
    since nobody can modify these objects using SNMP to modify the operational
    characteristics of the device. This really defeats the purpose.
    Issue 16: The prtGeneralConfigChanges identifies when the finDevice table
    changes? I don't really think so. The values of read-write entries can be
    modified, but the onl;y way an application can determine which rows have
    changed is to compare every entry in the table looking for changes. This is
    horrible for management applications.
    Issue 19: I think you missed the point here. You have two enums that are
    binary opposites - known and unknown. What is there that is other, that is
    is not known or unknown?
    my $.02
    dbh
    David Harrington
    Director, Network Management Architecture
    Enterasys Networks, Inc.
    dbh@enterasys.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 30 2001 - 12:39:13 EST