IFX Mail Archive: IFX> Re: Notes on the IFX part of the IPPF

IFX> Re: Notes on the IFX part of the IPPFAX telecon, Friday, Aug 17

From: Marty Joel (mjoel@netreon.com)
Date: Sun Aug 19 2001 - 17:05:00 EDT

Next message: Hiroshi Tamura: "Re: Fwd: IFX> FW: notes from the ietf FAX wg meeting at IETF 51"

Previous message: Hastings, Tom N: "IFX> More detail about the IPPFAX presentation to the Internet FAX WG at London IETF"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Tom,

1. Did we decide that receivers had to have certificates, but they could
be self-signed?

2.

>> 16. An initial IPP request never uses TLS.

That's not true; a client can submit requests in SSL.

3.

>> Distribution of public keys to Senders or Receivers...

Wasn't that for private keys, for installing a certificate remotely?

4. I thought we ditched final-destination-uri in favor of the
implementation-dependant ability to use VCards to notify recipients.

Regards,

Marty

Next message: Hiroshi Tamura: "Re: Fwd: IFX> FW: notes from the ietf FAX wg meeting at IETF 51"
Previous message: Hastings, Tom N: "IFX> More detail about the IPPFAX presentation to the Internet FAX WG at London IETF"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 19 2001 - 17:06:06 EDT