IFX Mail Archive: IFX> FW: [IETF-FAX] Request for IESG Consi

IFX Mail Archive: IFX> FW: [IETF-FAX] Request for IESG Consi

IFX> FW: [IETF-FAX] Request for IESG Consideration for two I-Ds

From: McDonald, Ira (imcdonald@sharplabs.com)
Date: Mon Mar 04 2002 - 13:49:04 EST

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "IFX> FW: Fax WG - draft Agenda at Minneapolis"

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Hiroshi Tamura [mailto:tamura@toda.ricoh.co.jp]
    Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 5:29 AM
    To: ned.freed@mrochek.com; paf@cisco.com; ietf-secretariat@ietf.org
    Cc: claudio.allocchio@garr.it; ietf-fax@imc.org; gregv@lucent.com;
    Subject: Re: [IETF-FAX] Request for IESG Consideration for two I-Ds

    IETF secretary,

    As Graham commented, I request as follows. Excuse me for it.


    Timely Completion for Internet Messaging Services

    Status: Proposed Standard


    This specification provides a way to request timely completion for
    Internet mail delivery, for services such as facsimile and voice
    messaging. Traditional Internet mail uses a _postal_ mail model,
    with normal delivery having an indeterminate gap between delivery
    into a mailbox and processing by the recipient. Timely completion
    adds a timelines service feature and extends delivery processing
    all the way to the recipient. This specification provides a
    deterministic service quality response, while preserving most of
    the traditional roles and responsibilities of the agents involved
    in email transfers.

    It is essentially a profile of the Delivery Service Notification
    (DSN) and DELIVERBY extensions for ESMTP, along with a new TIMELY
    option to DELIVERBY with a new deterministic service quality

    Working Group Last Call Result:

    The I-D was submitted for IETF-FAX WG Last Call on November 22 last year.
    During WG LC period, there were no comments.
    It sucessfully finished on December 6. So far, the editors and the
    wg chairs were confirming a few things. The I-D has a small normative
    dependency on draft-vaudreuil-1983ext-xx.txt. It should be considered
    at the same time. Excuse me for my slow action.


    Regarding the second one (draft-ietf-fax-tiff-regbis-04.txt),
    the original request is valid.



    Thanks for your addition.

    Best Regards,

    Hiroshi Tamura
    IETF FAX WG co-chair

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 04 2002 - 13:49:10 EST