IFX Mail Archive: RE: IFX> A new revision of the IPPFax spec

IFX Mail Archive: RE: IFX> A new revision of the IPPFax spec

RE: IFX> A new revision of the IPPFax specification is ready [min or comments]

From: Hastings, Tom N (hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Date: Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:12:47 EST

  • Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IFX> A new revision of the IPPFax specification is ready [fol low up on minor comments]"

    Gail and Rick,

    Here are some minor comments on the Draft 12:

    1. The new paragraph added to section 6 is good to have:

    "A Sender MUST NOT use any OPTIONAL feature in PDFax unless it first queries
    the Receiver to confirm that the Receiver supports the feature. If the
    feature is not supported in the Receiver then the Sender MUST NOT use the
    OPTIONAL feature. A Sender MUST NOT use any feature that is prohibited in
    PDFax [ifx-pdfax] specification."

    1a. However, it would be better to put it in the Conformance Section 15 or
    somewhere else. The conformance section 15 needs to make reference to it.

    1b. Section 1.1, point number 1 isn't as strong as your new paragraph:

    "1. Get-Printer-Attributes - Sender MUST verify that the Printer object is
    an (IPPFAX) Receiver and SHOULD determine some of the Receiver's basic
    capabilities, such as PDFax profiles supported."

    This paragraph only says SHOULD, but paragraph 2:

    "2. Validate-Job - Sender MUST verify that the Receiver can support the Job
    attributes that the Sender will send in the IPPFAX Job."

    requires that the Sender do a Validate-Job in order to ensure that
    unsupported attributes are not being submitted.

    2. The keywords in the new table 5 and 6 need to be made all lower case and
    use hyphens between words to follow IPP keyword rules.

    I'll try calling in during the 1-3 PM CST time as well.

    Thanks for setting up the call-in.

    Tom

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Gail Songer [mailto:gsonger@peerless.com]
    Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:08
    To: ifx@pwg.org
    Subject: IFX> A new revision of the IPPFax specification is ready.

    The corresponding changes to the ifx-spec are now available:

    ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/QUALDOCS/ifx-spec-12-rev.pdf
    ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/QUALDOCS/ifx-spec-12-rev.doc

    Gail

    |---------+---------------------------->
    | | "Rick Seeler" |
    | | <rseeler@adobe.co|
    | | m> |
    | | Sent by: |
    | | owner-ifx@pwg.org|
    | | |
    | | |
    | | 10/23/2002 10:59 |
    | | AM |
    | | |
    |---------+---------------------------->
     
    >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---------------------------------------------------|
      |
    |
      | To: <ifx@pwg.org>
    |
      | cc:
    |
      | Subject: IFX> A new revision of the PDFax specification is ready.
    |
     
    >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---------------------------------------------------|

    IPPFAX people,

    Here is revision 0.2 of the PDFax specification. This will be the
    revision that we will review in New Orleans next month. Please note the
    'issues' with PDFax in section 5 of this document, they will be
    discussed in New Orleans.

    ftp://pwg.org/pub/pwg/QUALDOCS/pdfax-spec-02.pdf

    For the version noting the changes from 0.1 --
    ftp://pwg.org/pub/pwg/QUALDOCS/pdfax-spec-02-rev.pdf

    Thanks for everyone's help.

    -Rick Seeler
    -Adobe Systems



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:13:13 EST