IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> MOD - new model document with fixes for typos and m

Re: IPP> MOD - new model document with fixes for typos and m

Carl Kugler (kugler@us.ibm.com)
Mon, 1 Jun 1998 11:04:11 -0400

If "request processing" is a significant concept not covered by "receiv=
ed, and
validated, and ... Job object has been created", then I think it needs =
a
definition. I myself don't know what it means (but I understand that i=
t is
distinct from "job processing").

-Carl

SISAACSON@novell.com on 05/29/98 05:21:57 PM
Please respond to SISAACSON@novell.com
To: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM@ibmus, hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com
cc: ipp@pwg.org
Subject: Re: IPP> MOD - new model document with fixes for typos and m

Carl - Yes, there is a difference between "request processing" and
"job processing". This is what I tried to make clear. Do you agree
with Tom's suggestion, or do we need to do something else.

I propose changing the last word in Tom's new definition to

In the case of a Print-Job operation, the
'successful-ok' status code indicates that the request was successfully=

received, and validated, and that the Job object has been created; it
does not indicate that the job has been (old: printed) (new: processed)=