If there is one URL scheme for a fax telephone number and another for a voice
telephone number. What scheme do I use for a telephone number that handles
both fax and voice? Is there a third scheme that means "voice or fax"?
Bob Herriot
At 01:01 PM 7/14/98 , Keith Moore wrote:
>> If there is going to be a separate "E.164" URL type for voice and fax, how
>> does mechanism work for phone numbers that are both voice and fax -- many
>> homes have a system that takes voice messages and faxes.
>
>There is not going to be a separate E.164 URL type. It was eventually
>clear to (nearly) everyone that this was the wrong way to go.
>
>Voice and fax on the same E.164 number are really no different than
>multiple services served by the same IP address. In either case,
>we use a different URL scheme name for each service.
>
>Keith
>
--=====================_670366005==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
If there is one URL scheme for a fax telephone number and
another for a voice telephone number. What scheme do I use for a
telephone number that handles both fax and voice? Is there a third
scheme that means "voice or fax"?
Bob Herriot
At 01:01 PM 7/14/98 , Keith Moore wrote:
>> If there is going to be a separate "E.164" URL type
for voice and fax, how
>> does mechanism work for phone numbers that are both voice and
fax -- many
>> homes have a system that takes voice messages and faxes.
>
>There is not going to be a separate E.164 URL type. It was
eventually
>clear to (nearly) everyone that this was the wrong way to go.
>
>Voice and fax on the same E.164 number are really no different
than
>multiple services served by the same IP address. In either
case,
>we use a different URL scheme name for each service.
>
>Keith
>
--=====================_670366005==_.ALT--