IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> Where do we stand in the debate?

Re: IPP> Where do we stand in the debate?

Harry Lewis (harryl@us.ibm.com)
Wed, 15 Jul 1998 11:02:01 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Harry Lewis: "Re: IPP> possible compromise?"
Previous message: Bennett, Joel H: "RE: IPP> Re: IPP Scheme"
Maybe in reply to: Carl-Uno Manros: "IPP> Where do we stand in the debate?"

Carl-Uno. thank you very much for the summary. This is quite helpful. I=
would
like to seek even further clarification.

>"ipp:" will NEVER be used on the HTTP layer.

Is this the same as saying that (by example)
ipp://my.printer.com will ALWAYS mean
http://my.printer.com:631
and (by further example)
ipp://my.printer.com:444 will mean
http://my.printer.com:444?

Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
=

Next message: Harry Lewis: "Re: IPP> possible compromise?"
Previous message: Bennett, Joel H: "RE: IPP> Re: IPP Scheme"
Maybe in reply to: Carl-Uno Manros: "IPP> Where do we stand in the debate?"