IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking

RE: IPP> Implementation question re.: chunking

Turner, Randy (rturner@sharplabs.com)
Fri, 24 Jul 1998 10:48:19 -0700

Well, I'm assuming since we "last-call'd" these documents in the WG,
that everybody is in agreement that an implementation that doesn't
support chunking isn't compliant.

Randy

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Moore [mailto:paulmo@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, July 24, 1998 10:25 AM
To: 'Randy Turner'; Carl Kugler
Cc: ipp@pwg.org
Subject: RE: IPP> Implementation question re.:
chunking

You might find that some implementations dont support
chunking.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Turner [SMTP:rturner@sharplabs.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 1998 10:05 AM
> To: Carl Kugler
> Cc: ipp@pwg.org
> Subject: Re: IPP> Implementation question re.:
chunking
>
> At 04:51 PM 7/24/98 +0000, you wrote:
> >draft-ietf-ipp-protocol-06.txt says the client and
server MUST support
> the
> "chunked" transfer encoding when receiving. My
question is: Can we count
> on this? I.e., if our client always transmits
requests using the
> "chunked"
> transfer encoding, will we be able to interoperate
with the vast majority
> of IPP server implementations?
> >
> > -Carl
>
>
> There are no vast majority of IPP server
implementations (yet). I think
> the
> only worry is if someone plans to deploy IPP behind a
generic web server
> that doesn't support chunking. However, Apache and
most other of the more
> popular HTTP/1.1 servers will support this. It should
definitely be a
> bullet item (checkoff item) at the upcoming bake-off,
however.
>
> Randy
>
> >