IPP Mail Archive: (no subject)

IPP Mail Archive: (no subject)

(no subject)

Fri, 14 Aug 1998 07:28:33 +0100

From: Harry Lewis <harryl@us.ibm.com>
To: <ipp@pwg.org>
Cc: Steve Gebert <stevegeb@us.ibm.com>, Carl Kugler <kugler@us.ibm.com>,
Subject: Re: IPP> MOD - Questions on IPP
Message-ID: <5030100024532553000002L032*@MHS>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 17:19:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org

Carl-Uno, here is my response to your questions...

1) Is it really necessary to keep the "Validate-Job" operation as a =
implement? The "Get-Printer-Attributes" operation seems to provide all =
functionality that is needed.

HRL> Validate job is intended to pertain to more than just printer =
It should also cover print job attributes (like n-up, for example). =
Validate-Job akin to checking the "job ticket" whereas =
is akin to determining the device configuration?

2) Can you implement the operations "Create-Job", "Send-Document" and
"Send-URI", without the need to support multiple documents? This could =
useful for environments where you have long jobs, but do not need =
for multiple documents.

HRL> The model document supports the notion of a Create-Job operation =
by only one Send-Document operation as semantically equivalent to a =
operation. It cautions regarding performance, however. If you are =
asking is it
ok to support Creat-Job, Send-Doc with only one document - Yes. If you =
asking is it ok to support Create-Job but LIMIT Send-Dco to only one
document... I'd say that would be a non-no!

3) What was the rationale for making the "printer-up-time" attribute a
REQUIRED attribute, considering that the other 3 attributes
"time-at-creation", "time-at-processing", and "time-at-completed", with
which it is associated, are all OPTIONAL?

HRL> Don't know for sure but I suspect this attempts to make a running =
marker" available for monitoring, tracking accounting etc... without =
all the possible time recording points on each IPP device. This si =
analogous to the sysUpTime concept in MIB-II.

Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems