IPP Mail Archive: (no subject)

IPP Mail Archive: (no subject)

(no subject)

Mon, 31 Aug 1998 07:30:29 +0100

Message-Id: <s5e6cf7d.032@ORM-BBWEB.orem.novell.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 15:39:54 -0600
From: "Hugo Parra" <HPARRA@novell.com>
To: <ipp@pwg.org>, <rturner@sharplabs.com>
Subject: Re: RE: IPP> Handling of invalid "request-id"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org


I'm reading section 16.3.3 of the "Model and Semantics" document.

-Hugo Parra

>>> "Turner, Randy" <rturner@sharplabs.com> 08/28 3:29 PM >>>

I can't remember if the request-id is the same as a request
"transaction-id", but if it is, the server never validates this field. =
It is
set by the client and echoed back by the server in the corresponding
response. There is no validity check made by the server (that I am =


-----Original Message-----
From: Hugo Parra [mailto:HPARRA@novell.com]=20
Sent: Friday, August 28, 1998 2:04 PM
To: ipp@pwg.org=20
Subject: IPP> Handling of invalid "request-id"

Suppose the Printer object, while parsing an IPP requests, fails to =
the "request-id" in the incoming payload (because the packet was =
or because the value is not between 1 and 2**31-1). The documents =
that the Printer object should return a 'client-error-bad-request' =
code. That's fine; now my question: What request-id should the Printer
object include in the response (I'm assuming that responses with error
status codes must also include version, request-id, charset, etc.)? =
0 be used to handle this cases?

-Hugo Parra