IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> HTTP 1.0 usage in IPP 1.0

IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> HTTP 1.0 usage in IPP 1.0

Re: IPP> HTTP 1.0 usage in IPP 1.0

Randy Turner (rturner@sharplabs.com)
Mon, 12 Oct 1998 14:34:55 -0700

Ditto. I would try 1.1 first, then fallback.

Randy

At 03:31 PM 10/12/98 -0400, don@lexmark.com wrote:
>I would, in fact, recommend the opposite approach -- try 1.1 first and
fall back
>to 1.0 if 1.1 fails.
>
>Don
>
>
>
>
>Babak Jahromi <babakj%microsoft.com@interlock.lexmark.com> on 10/12/98
02:55:49
>PM
>
>To: ipp%pwg.org@interlock.lexmark.com
>cc: Weihai Chen <weihaic%microsoft.com@interlock.lexmark.com> (bcc: Don
> Wright/Lex/Lexmark)
>bcc: Don Wright/Lex/Lexmark
>Subject: IPP> HTTP 1.0 usage in IPP 1.0
>
>
>
>
>
>IPP implementers,
>
>Given that there are proxies out there that may not handle HTTP 1.1 well, we
>would like our IPP 1.0 client to try HTTP 1.0 first, and then switch to HTTP
>1.1 if the first attempt fails.
>
>Before we implement that, I would like to get a consensus on what others are
>planning to do:
>
>1) Are most people planning to support HTTP 1.0 also?
>2) If not, how are you going to fail HTTP 1.0 requests?
>
>Thanks,
>Babak Jahromi,
>Microsoft
>