It is not a matter of 'being bothered'. I could not find a description of
the proposed changes anywhere. I asked for this a couple of times and could
not find any document describing them. Maybe I missed something.
You should take my silence as 'abstaining until I know what I'm being asked
to vote on'
From: Manros, Carl-Uno B [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 1998 6:49 PM
Subject: IPP> ADM - Results of voting on the NLO Issues
The voting period for our NLO issues has just expired. There were fewer
votes than I had expected, hope I did not miss anybody who actually sent in
a vote. Among the votes we have so far, it seems that most everybody are in
favor of the proposed simplifications.
A number of people who are known to have implementations, did not bother to
vote. This is worrying.
I know that some people are still waiting for the new test scripts to find
out exactly how their implementation reacts.
Let us discuss this again in tomorrow's phone conference.
Here is the list so far:
IPP Member NLO 2 NLO 3 NLO 4
========== ===== ===== =====
Bob Herriot Y? N?
Ira McDonald Y Y
Michael Sweet Y Y Y
Hugo Parra Y
Stuart Rowley Y Y
Stephanie Suzuki Y Y Y
Ron Bergman Y Y Y
Henrik Holst Y
Maulik Desai Y Y Y
Yuji Sasaki Y
Brian Glass Y
Peter Michalek Y Y Y
Carl-Uno Manros Principal Engineer - Advanced Printing Standards - Xerox Corporation 701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231 Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514 Email: email@example.com