From: Robert Herriot [mailto:robert.herriot@Eng.Sun.COM]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 1999 4:38 PM
To: Ira McDonald; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; =
Subject: Re: IPP> Revised SLP 'printer:' template for comments
At our Tucson meeting, the IPP group agreed with James Kempf that there =
should be a separate SLP entry for each URI and that the URI associated =
the entry would be the printer's URI.=A0 Ira, I know that you disagreed =
If we stay with this decision, it implies to me that there is=20
=A0=A0 a)=A0 no need for the 'printer-uri-supported' attribute in the =
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 determined by finding all URI's containing a =
'printer-name' with a
=A0=A0 b)=A0 'uri-security-supported' contains the security supported =
associated URI and
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 not for other URIs associated with a printer.
=A0=A0 c)=A0 the complexity of two parallel attributes is eliminated.