Well it was my understanding that we didn't agree on a mandatory method.
And the INDP method
won't go through a firewall, so if you are searching for a mandatory method
I would say MAILTO.
"Zehler, Peter" <Peter.Zehler@usa.xerox.com>@pwg.org on 20-06-2000 17:43:51
Sent by: firstname.lastname@example.org
To: "IPP Discussion List (E-mail)" <IPP@pwg.org>
Subject: IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification agreement
I am working the content planning for the IPP Bake-Off. I want to be sure
that there is PWG wide agreement on the notification issue.
It is my understanding that INDP is the mandated IPP notification method.
There were some minor updates that have been agreed to and we are awaiting
the final version of the document for PWG last call. The minor changes are
documented in the meeting minutes from May meeting of the PWG. This
upcoming INDP document will be the document that the notification section
the Bake-Off will use as a base.
Is this correct or did I misunderstand?
Xerox Architecture Center
Voice: (716) 265-8755
FAX: (716) 265-8792
US Mail: Peter Zehler
800 Phillips Rd.
Webster NY, 14580-9701
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 21 2000 - 04:00:45 EDT