IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification a

Re: IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification agreement

From: Jay Martin (jkm@underscore.com)
Date: Fri Jun 23 2000 - 07:47:15 EDT

  • Next message: henrik.holst@i-data.com: "RE: IPP> TES: Mandatory IPP notification agreement"

    henrik.holst@i-data.com wrote:
    >
    > I just think it's really strange if we describe an Internet Printing
    > Protocol but the mandatory notification method won't work in 99% of
    > the user cases!

    Would you be so kind as to explain what you believe is the "99%" case?
    I'm confused about what *most* PWG participants believe are the *real*
    use cases for IPP. (I guess I've been a bit confused about this since
    the very beginning.)

            ...jay

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 07:55:29 EDT